Comments on: Mongolian, Uyghur languages are Altaic languages while Mandarin is not, proves that Xinjiang is stolen land?

By: Mr Hex Vision

Mr Hex Vision — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:03:50 +0000

Do its does not prove that Xinjiang was stolen, all it could mean is that Altaic languages drifted into Xinjiang.

But it does not meant that once upon a time that Xinjiang was n ot part of Chinese lands.

Oh btw not all native Indian lands were stolen, some where bought off them.

By: williams

williams — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:03:50 +0000

the America belonged to native Indians, but it doesn’t belong to them any more.

By: Hai Bo: Chinese Schutzstaffel

Hai Bo: Chinese Schutzstaffel — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:03:50 +0000

Yes, we stole it again and again and hell bent to integrate it with China.

We will remove all traces of Uyghur language and culture.

By: FizzyBubbler

FizzyBubbler — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:03:50 +0000

All land is stolen from someone. Should the US give the land back to the natives? Who cares who it belongs to, it all belongs to someone. Arguing this point will only make your own country out to be "evil" as well.

By: dooniebrasco

dooniebrasco — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:03:50 +0000

China conquered Xinjiang but not steal.
Now its not a colony or something else ,its a part of china.
Chinese have so many dialects and you cant take language as a prove.